Legal Opinion

Brink v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1901No. 13,613PublishedCited by 8 opinions

IN RE E. H. Vordenbaumen, Applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, State of Louisiana.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

Suits were brought by Mrs. Jennie Neeland and S. O. Brink against J. M. Bartlett, contractor, and E. H. Vordenbaumen, surety, on his bond for building materials furnished by them to the contractor just named. The grounds being similar, both applications— that of S. O. Brink and that of Mrs. Neeland — are passed upon and decided as on one application for both.

The facts shown by the testimony are that J. M. Bartlett, a building contractor, entered into a contract with Neith Lodge of Odd Fellows at Shreveport to construct a building for the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PeraltaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Ketteringham v. Eureka Homestead Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Utah Const. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Fossier v. Knight Motors Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Board of Com'rs v. Dowdle & WindettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API