Legal Opinion
Utah Const. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1926No. 4788PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The contention of the plaintiffs in error, that the findings of fact set forth in the statement are wholly unsupported by evidence, cannot be sustained. The testimony is that, before the execution of the contract with Paul, Samuels, vice president and general manager .of the Wattis-Samuels Company, met Paul; that Paul told him 'that he expected to secure material for the weir from the bed of the Sacramento river; that thereafter Samuels investigated the probability of there being sufficient sand and gravel in the bar to build the weir; that Samuels…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Woodbury Granite Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- United States ex rel. Galliher & Huguely, Inc. v. James Baird Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Holloway & Dupont Dredging Co. v. Des Rocher & Watkins Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Continental Casualty Co. v. North American Cement Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.