Legal Opinion
Haft v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 19, 1994No. 1-93-2146PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE CAHILL
delivered the opinion of the court:
We address two questions in this appeal: whether a premium finance company was required under Illinois law in 1983 to notify an additional insured when it requested cancellation of an insurance policy, and whether a private right of action exists under that part of the Insurance Code which governs the conduct of premium finance companies. We answer yes to both questions and affirm the trial court.
In 1983, the Insurance Code required a premium finance company to notify "the insured” when it requested that a policy be cancelled. (Ill.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Corgan v. MuehlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MikuschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Rodgers v. St. Mary's Hosp. of DecaturIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Wasmund v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- MIDWEST CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO., INC. v. Bituminous Cas. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carr v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Casualty Insurance v. Hill Mechanical GroupAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Olivine Corp. v. United Capitol InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Olivine Corp. v. United Capitol Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Plasma Fab, LLC and Russell McCann v. BankDirect Capital Finance, LLC, a Subsidiary of Texas Capital Bank, N.A. And Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.