Legal Opinion
Luke v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 25, 1974No. 49202PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Luke, the appellant, is one of two defendants, the other being Cumbie, who were jointly indicted for burglary. They were represented by different counsel and obtained separate trials. Each was convicted. Individual appeals followed. With the single exception of enumerating error on their respective motions to suppress evidence their assignments of error differ. The Cumbie case (page 807, post) is being affirmed contemporaneously with the instant decision on the Luke appeal.
1. The first enumeration of error attacks the court’s ruling denying the motion to suppress evidence.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Hollis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Loder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.