Legal Opinion

Connell v. Crosby

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1904PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Mercer county; the Hon. W. T. Church, Judge, presiding'.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This was a proceeding instituted in the county court of Mercer county by the appellee, county treasurer of the county, under the provisions of sections 13,14 and 15 of the act entitled “An act to tax gifts, legacies and inheritances,” etc., approved June 15, 1895, (Hurd’s Stat. 1899, chap. 120, pars. 378-380,) and to fix and recover the amount of the inheritance tax alleged to be payable by James H. Connell, executor, and Vashti Drury, executrix, of the last will of William Drury, deceased. The proceeding resulted in the entry of an order in the said county court finding that said executor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wunderle v. WunderleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Farmer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Dutton v. Board of ReviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Provident Hospital & Training School Ass'n v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Caveney v. BowerIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. PasfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In re Estate of GravesIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In re Estate of SanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API