Morrison v. City of Aurora
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TURSI, Judge.
The defendant, City of Aurora, appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs-property owners, Milford Dean Morrison and Ralph J. Redfern, on their claims for inverse condemnation, negligence, and breach of contract. Its principal contentions are that the trial court erred by ruling: 1) that Aurora’s final implementation of floodway restrictions in 1982 was a taking of the plaintiffs’ property; 2) that the plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim is not subject to the timely notice requirement of the Immunity Act; and, 3) that, in any event, the plaintiffs had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Asphalt Paving Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Kristensen v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Camas Colorado, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Patzer v. City of LovelandColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Carothers v. Archuleta County SheriffColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- King v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Brown v. TeitelbaumColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.