United States v. Cruz
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
The above-captioned action is before this Court upon defendant’s motion for a new trial, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
-BACKGROUND-
Defendant Libertad Cruz was named in a six-count superseding indictment charging him with the following: 1) conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, heroin and cocaine; 2) engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise; 3) three counts of distributing heroin; and 4) carrying a firearm during the commission…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- United States v. George StofskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. AlessiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Nick Dipaolo and Edward WeatherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. CastanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. Kwok Ching YuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. MatosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. NelsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.