Legal Opinion
United States v. Matos
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1991No. SS 88 Cr. 153 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Alfredo Peralta-Matos (“Matos”) has moved pursuant to Rule 33, Fed. R.Crim.P. for an order granting him a new trial. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
Procedural and Factual Background
Matos was convicted on ■ May 24, 1989 following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of (1) conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; (2) distributing and possessing with intent to distribute, together with codefendants, approximately 1,007 grams of cocaine in violation of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. George StofskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. AlessiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Herbert R. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Thomas P. JasinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Bouknight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rigas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- United States v. Thomas P. JasinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. ZviDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997