Legal Opinion

Touse v. Consolidated Ry. & Power Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1905No. 1607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; S. W. Stewart, Judge. Action by Mohr Touse against the Consolidation Eailway & Power Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

This action was brought to recover- damages for personal injuries and injury to property alleged to have been caused through the negligence of the defendant. At the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $600, and judgment was entered accordingly.

*96The questions presented on this appeal all relate to alleged errors committed by the court in the admission of testimony, > in charging the jury, and in refusing to charge the jury as requested. Counsel for appellant, in their brief, say: “We will only attempt in this brief to bring before the courj; the admitted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKay v. FarrUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Woolsey v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Swenson v. SnellUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Thompson v. HaysUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Paulson v. LyonUtah Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Law, Co. v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Manatee County State Bank v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Habeas Corpus of Saparito v. HelmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API