Lankford v. State Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
The plaintiffs were not required by law to set forth, as an exhibit, more than the face of the policy. Notwithstanding that the exhibited portions of the policies recite that the *633provisions of another page, incorporated by reference in the policies, are to be taken as part of the insurance contract, such additional page is not set forth and can not be considered by this court in passing on the general demurrer. It is clear that the policies provided for payment of premiums in addition to the initial premium, but it is not shown by the record that in the absence of such payments the insurance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Haas v. Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Plumer v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Illinois Life Insurance v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Friend v. Southern States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guest v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- American International Life Insurance v. HartsfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. LockettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- National-Ben Franklin Insurance v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.