Legal Opinion

Benalcazar v. Goldsmith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

Mr. Arthur H. Goldsmith, an attorney, appeals from the denial of his “motion to establish and enforce his attorney’s lien and his contractual rights under the parties’ fee agreement” and from the denial of his “motion for relief from ruling on his attorney fees lien petition.” Mr. Goldsmith asked a judge of the Superior Court “pursuant to G. L. c. 221, § 50, and Mass. R. Civ. P. 57 and 65 [, 365 Mass. 826, 832 (1974),] to determine, declare, establish and enforce a lien for one-third of the plaintiff’s recovery.” The judge found “that the attorney, while not receiving adequate compensation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Merrimack Valley National Bank v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Hamilton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Black v. School Committee of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Guerrant v. RothAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd. v. PIMCO Income Strategy FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Cambridge Trust Co. v. Hanify & King Professional Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Blake v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Smith v. ConsalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API