Legal Opinion

Glaab v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 2012PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY GANTMAN, J.:

Appellant, Karl Glaab, appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas in favor of Appellees in this asbestos action. Appellant asks us to determine whether he made out a prima facie case of a compen-sable asbestos-related injury to defeat the entry of summary judgment. We hold Appellant presented a prima facie case of an asbestos-related compensable injury to overcome a dispositive motion at this stage of the proceedings. Accordingly, we vacate and remand the case for further prosecution.

The trial court sets forth the relevant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Chenot v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeArmitt v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Krepps, F. v. Snyder, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC. v. Dowell, Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Central PA Radiation Oncology, P.C., a PA corp. v. The Good Samaritan Hospital of Lebanon, PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Haldaman, D. v. Eaton CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API