Legal Opinion

Rogers v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 22, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 8784PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.

This proceeding seeks the recovery of damages for personal injuries under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act. The defendant has moved for judgment on the pleadings or in the alternative for summary judgment. The motion is based upon the record, including certain depositions taken by the parties under discovery proceedings. The defendant contends that such record shows that there is no genuine issue of fact involved and that it is entitled, on the undisputed facts, to judgment in its favor as a matter of law.

The plaintiff, after a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Cohen v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1966
  4. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Utilities Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Fleishour v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Muniz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1980
  3. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  4. Barry Dean Rogers, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Luther James Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Barry Dean Rogers, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Luther James Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API