Legal Opinion
De Groot v. Brooklyn Daily Times
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The complaint in its present form alleges but one cause of action, founded upon the publication marked Exhibit “ C.” It is not now claimed by the plaintiff that the first two publications, Exhibits “ A ” and “ B,” were false or libelous. They are incorporated in the complaint on the theory that they explain certain phrases in Exhibit “ C,” the full meaning of which will not be conveyed without reference to Exhibits “ A ” and “ B.” (Fisher v. New Yorker…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cook v. . ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Woodhouse v. New York Evening Post, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Fisher v. New Yorker Staats-ZeitungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keystone Oil Burner Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- McInerney v. New York World-Telegram Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Wilpon v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971