Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rave v. Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission

Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court

Decided October 9, 1997No. CV 96-33PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*212JUDGEMENT (Modified After Completion of Remand)

MARK BUTTERFIELD, Chief Judge.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case is back before the Court on petition of the appellant after remand to the HCN Gaming Commission, hereafter “Commission,” in April 1997. The Commission had suspended petitioner’s gaming license for a period of one year by decision dated June 21, 1996. The petitioner sought judicial review of the Commission decision and relief in the form of reinstatement to his former position as Bingo/Floor Checker/Caller at the Ho-Chunk Casino and the return of his gaming license. The Court reviewed his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hiller v. Ho-Chunk Gaming CommissionHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2000
  2. Gerhartz v. Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming CommissionHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API