Legal Opinion

Collins v. Burns

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from, Dist/riot Court of Pithm County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Helm

The court did not err in overruling the challenges for cause to the jurors Hewitt and Tourtelotte. Hewitt had *8heard “ some of the facts.” Tourtelotte had “ heard of the case.” Hewitt, at the time he learned of the matters involved, formed “ a slight opinion,” but had since forgotten even the statements made to him. Tourtelotte formed and ' expressed a conditional opinion, which, however, did not concern the real merits of the controversy. Each swore upon his vow di/re that he thought he could try the case fairly upon the evidence introduced at the trial, regardless of the opinion previously…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Denver, South Park & Pacific R. R. v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Day v. MaddenColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. KalkmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Wheeler v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  4. Rio Grande Southern Railroad v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Anderson v. TingleyWashington Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API