Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allied Mutual Insurance Co. v. Heiken

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 25, 2004No. 02-1996Published

1DissentCarter, Justice

I dissent.

Although Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co., 580 N.W.2d 788 (Iowa 1998), is not strictly in conflict with the majority’s holding because the right of the subrogated insurer to sue the tortfeasor was not an issue in that case, the conclusions upon which that *831decision was based and the conclusions in Kmpf'l v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 548 N.W.2d 877 (Iowa 1996), and United Security Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 278 N.W.2d 29 (Iowa 1979), leave no doubt that under Iowa law a partially indemnified insured is empowered to control the litigation. A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark v. BremnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. United Security Insurance Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Caligiuri Ex Rel. Caligiuri v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Krapfl v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API