Legal Opinion
Traders & General Insurance v. Freeman
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 20, 2000No. CV 98-1263-HUPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubei filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 9, 1999. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71 L.Ed.2d 461…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Sager v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Volquardson v. Hartford InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2002