Legal Opinion
Howard v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1956No. Civ. No. 17017PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The testatrix created a trust the terms of which as expressed in the decree of distribution (rendered in 1942 and long since final) were as follows: “To *781pay the net income thereof nnto Bertha G. Howard until her death; at the death of said Bertha C. Howard the trust shall terminate and the trust estate shall vest in and the trustee shall pay, transfer and deliver the same unto Rachel F. Anderson, Edith A. Bonner and Parker N. Howard in equal shares.”
Each of these beneficiaries survived the testatrix but two of the remaindermen (Anderson and Bonner) predeceased the life…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Keating v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Randall v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Estate of LiddleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Estate of MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Burkett v. CapovillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Estate of NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.