Legal Opinion
State v. Voeller
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1984No. Cr. 977PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
A jury found the defendant, Brian D. Voeller, guilty of having delivered a con trolled substance in violation of Sections 19-03.l-23(l)(b) and 19-03.l-05(4)(o), N.D. C.C. Voeller appeals from the jury’s verdict of guilty and the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm.
Voeller raises the following issues on appeal: (1) “Was the evidence presented at trial sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict?” (2) “Did the trial court err in denying the defendant’s request of the court to poll the jurors individually because of negative publicity…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. John Edward Jones, A/K/A Liddy Jones, A/K/A Malik Shariff, United States of America v. Robert Avon Jones, A/K/A BobbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. OhnstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BonnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.