Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Cuneo Law Group, P.C.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 17, 2011No. 09-7151PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was considered on the record and on the briefs of counsel. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. R. 34(j). We have given the issues full consideration and have determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(d). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Jonathan Cuneo and the Cuneo Law Group (collectively, “Cuneo”) filed suit in the district court seeking a declaratory judgment that their former staff attorney, Joel Joseph,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Debnam v. Crane Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. JosephDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Draim v. Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. S. Brooke Purll, Inc. v. VailesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Antoinette Burns v. Matthew LevyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Jsc Transmashholding v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Cuneo Law Group, P.C. v. JosephDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Joseph v. Cuneo Law Group, P.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API