Davis v. City of Detroit Financial Review Team
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Connell, J.
I concur with the majority opinion that the City of Detroit Financial Review Team is not subject to the Open Meetings Act (OMA), MCL 15.261 et seq. I also concur that the Governor and the State Treasurer, being individual executive branch officeholders, are not *628subject to the strictures of the OMA in these cases.1 I part ways with the majority opinion in its discussion of injunctive and declaratory relief. I write separately to emphasize that an injunction against a coequal branch of government should be an extremely rare remedy, available only after a party has definitively established that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Zivotofsky Ex Rel. Zivotofsky v. ClintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- People ex rel. Sutherland v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.