Legal Opinion

Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1992No. C9-91-2065, C9-91-2096PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Seven potato farming entities sued several seed potato suppliers, alleging damages resulting from sale of seed potatoes contaminated with bacterial ring rot. The suppliers included Richard and David Paquin, insured by State Farm, Gust Hangsleben, insured by two other companies, and P & H Farms, a partnership founded by the Pa-quins and Hangsleben.

The defendant suppliers sought defense and indemnification from their insurers. State Farm agreed to provide a defense, but claimed there was no coverage under its policies. The other insurers denied they had an obligation to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. HangslebenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Miller v. Nodak Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API