Legal Opinion

Goodsell v. Stinson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1845PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR, to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

% — Stinson, a judgment-creditor of Frederick E. Goodsell, filed a bill in chancery to set aside, as fraudulent and void, a mortgage executed by F. E. Goodsell and wife to Peter Goodsell. The bill alleges that on the 1st of October, 1840, the complainant recovered against F. E. Goodsell and one Shanklin a judgment for the sum of 2,712 dollars and 29 cents, the greater part of which is still due and unpaid; that on or about the date of the judgment, F. E. Goodsell, who resided at Evansville in this state, conveyed by deed of mortgage to his father, Peter Goodsell, who resided in the state of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  3. Case v. De GoesNew York Supreme Court · 1805

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fitzgerald v. GoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Owen v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Woodbury v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API