Fraternal Order of Police v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEY, Chief Justice:
This is a tax refund case brought by bingo operators. The Department denied the refund, and that ruling was affirmed by the administrative law judge and the circuit court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
This appeal requires the Court to construe several statutes which were repealed effective October 1, 1997. The parties have stipulated, however, that our decision will govern liability and refunds for the period July 1, 1992 to September 30,1997.
The first issue is whether bingo taxes collected pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. §§ 12-21-3440(B) and 12-21-3441 (Supp.1997)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Wingfield v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Town of PagelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- McClain v. South Carolina Department of EducationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Greystone Catering Company, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue & TaxationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fraternal Order of Police v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Hancock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Rent-A-Center E., Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Sloan v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.