Legal Opinion
Shatter v. National Life & Accident Ins
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*218OPINION
By NICHOLS, J.
We hold 'that if acceptance of the premium after December 1st, and- after the first day of the month in approximately 58 instances was all that the company did, then these payments of over-due premiums were referable to the express provisions of the policy, and the plaintiff would not be entitled to benefits for the injury in question.
We cite:
Smith v Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, 179 Mo., 119; 135; 77 SW, 862.
Hawkins v Woodmen Accident Ass’n, 204 SW, 566.
*219Gagne v Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 78 N. H., 439; 101 Atl., 212.
National Life & Accident Co. v Reams…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trotter v. Grand Lodge of the Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Smith v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Morgan v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. ReamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Supreme Lodge, K. P. v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Starcher v. Reserve Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SimpsonTrumbull County Court of Common Pleas · 1956
- Schwartz v. Automobile Mut InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1938