Doyle v. State

I concur in the result reached by the majority as to Doyle's theft conviction for failure to make required disposition of property under IND.CODE 85-17-5-4, but believe my reasons for so doing merit discussion.

An indietment must be specific enough to apprise the defendant of the crime with which he is charged. Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098, 1104; Carter v. State, (1972) 155 Ind.App. 10, 18, 291 N.E.2d 109, 113. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt every material element of the crime with which the defendant is charged. See, Dillon v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 412,…