Legal Opinion
Shteynberg v. Sammartino
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 25, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01827Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUDOLPH SHTEYNBERG, Case No. 21-cv-01827-BAS-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 13 v. 14 JUDGE JANIS SAMMARTINIO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 In this action filed on October 27, 2021, Plaintiff Rudolph Shteynberg alleges that 19 United States District Judge Janis Sammartino discriminated against him based on his 20 status as an indigent litigant by denying him appointment of counsel in the prior, closed 21 actions he filed in 2017, over which Judge Sammartino presided. The Court ordered 22…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.