Legal Opinion

NUFI v. Garpo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 9, 2019No. 17-3286Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3286 NUFI v. Garpo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Figueroa v. MazzaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Diesel Props S.R.L. v. Greystone Business Credit II LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API