United States v. Marvin Byse
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we decide for the first time in our circuit whether sentencing statutes that punish more severely conduct involving base or crack cocaine as opposed to powder cocaine exhibit an unconstitutional, racially discriminatory purpose. The district court determined that the relevant sentencing provisions do not violate equal protection. We AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 1, 1992, defendant-appellant Marvin Byse was introduced to a government confidential informant by codefendant Greg Watkins. Byse and the informant discussed a crack cocaine purchase. They negotiated…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Christopher MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Coley QUINN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.