Legal Opinion

United States v. Various Articles of Merchandise, Seizure No. 148

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 7, 1985No. 84 C 7997, 84 C 8129 and 84 C 8611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

(INCLUDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW)

SHADUR, District Judge.

These in rem actions have been brought by the United States for forfeiture and destruction of allegedly obscene imported material seized from the United States mails by the Customs Service. 1 For the reasons stated in this opinion’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, issued as mandated by United States v. Various Articles of Merchandise, Seizure No. 170, 750 F.2d 596 (7th Cir.1984), this Court concludes all the seized materials are obscene and shall therefore be forfeited and destroyed.

T…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Schedule No. 2102Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alkot Industries, Inc. v. Takara Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  2. City of Farmington v. StansburyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Adult Video Ass'n v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API