Adult Video Ass'n v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
TURNER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed the instant complaint on October 22,1992, seeking a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that the film entitled “After Midnight” (“the videotape”) is protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution and is not legally obscene in the Western District of Tennessee (“the District”).1 Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint or in the alternative for a more definite statement. This court heard oral arguments on that motion on March 28, 1994.
FACTS
Plaintiffs are a trade association whose members are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.