Borchert v. Hecla Mining Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
I
On the authority of two ancient Idaho cases today’s plurality holds that a vendor need not offer a vendee the opportunity to cure a default and'sustains Hecla Mining in depriving the widow Borchert of what may be her one meager asset. In so doing, the plurality of a necessity ignores (1) the fact that Hecla Mining by a course of conduct indulged her defaults; and, (2) time-honored Idaho case law which firmly established that such a course of conduct waives the vendor’s right to declare forfeiture without first giving a reasonable notice of default to the vendee, which notice provides an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Duthie v. Lewiston Gun ClubIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Sullivan v. BurcawIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.