Legal Opinion
State, Ex Rel. Kling v. Nielsen, Supt.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 1957No. 2374PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiseman, J.
This is an action in mandamus invoking the original jurisdiction of this court.
Relators, for their first cause of action in their amended petition, allege that they are the owners or have an equitable interest in lots Nos. 43410, 43411, 43412, 43413 and 43414 of the consecutive numbers of lots on the revised plat of the city of Dayton, Ohio; that said lots are located on state highway route No. 49, at the intersection of Salem Avenue and Elsmere Avenue; that said lots are in residence “B” zone, as prescribed by the zoning ordinance enacted by the Commission of the City of Dayton on April 30,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Fairmount Center Co. v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Gulf Refining Co. v. DeFranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- State ex rel. Del Monte v. WoodmanseeOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schlagheck v. WinterfeldOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- William R. Castle v. Robert E. McLaughlin Members of the Zoning Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Hausmann & Johnson, Inc. v. Berea Bd. of Bldg. Code AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Oliveira v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Vito v. Garfield Heights CityCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.