Legal Opinion
Mika v. Central Bank of Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 2003No. WD 61116PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Chief Judge.
Appellants, John Mika, Brigid Mika and Venus Automotive, Inc., owned two parcels of land in Kansas City, Missouri. Respondent Central Bank of Kansas City (“Central Bank”) was the holder of certain promissory notes secured by the properties. After Appellants stopped paying the amounts due on the notes, Central Bank initiated foreclosure proceedings. Central Bank purchased both properties at the foreclosure sale and sold one of the properties to Respondent University Health Services (“UHS”). Following this sale, Appellants filed a petition against Central Bank, UHS,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Coleman Motor Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Walker v. BohannanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- MacKe Laundry Service Ltd. Partnership v. Jetz Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Samvel Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Rotskoff v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Stander v. SzabadosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kevin M. Higgins and Sue E. Higgins v. Abigail J. Ferrari and Emmitt F. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ahern v. P & H, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.