Legal Opinion

Karin J. Stiens v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 10, 2020No. 2018 CA 001762Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

RENDERED: DECEMBER 11, 2020; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2018-CA-1762-MR KARIN J. STIENS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE PAMELA R. GOODWINE, JUDGE ACTION NO. 14-CI-02829 BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED APPELLEE OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** ** BEFORE: DIXON, JONES, AND MAZE, JUDGES. JONES, JUDGE: Appellant, Karin Stiens (“Stiens”), initiated the underlying action in Fayette Circuit Court against Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (“B & L”), Insite Vision, Inc., and Commonwealth Eye Surgery on a variety of products liability claims.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  4. Shelton v. Kentucky Easter Seals Society, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API