Legal Opinion
AUSTIN v. GIANT FOOD STORES
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 2020No. 2:20-cv-02050Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT AUSTIN, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-2050 : GIANT FOOD STORES, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM McHUGH, J. DECEMBER 18, 2020 In prior Memoranda and Orders, the Court granted leave to pro se Plaintiff Robert Austin to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his Complaint, Amended Complaint, and Second Amended Complaint without prejudice. In each of these instances, the Court found that Austin’s allegations did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.