Legal Opinion
Whitehead v. District of Columbia Child Support Services Division
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0641PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
In the present action, pro se Plaintiff James Whitehead brings claims against Defendant District of Columbia Child Support Services Division (“CSSD”) for the garnishment of his wages pursuant to a child support order. Defendant seeks dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). (Def.’s Mot. Dismiss at p. 1.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion and dismiss Plaintiffs complaint.
I. FACTUAL SUMMARY
In his March 29, 2011 complaint, Plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Trainor v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Scolaro v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections and EthicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Melton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Art and Drama Therapy Institute, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Proctor v. Title 4-DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bondoc v. BlakeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.