Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Flaccus

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1964No. 12307PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Caplan, Judge:

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff, Samuel L. Nes-bitt, wherein he seeks to recover from the defendants, Edward J. Flaccus, George E. Thieroff and Arthur C. Stifel, Jr., a certain sum of money which he alleges is owing to him as his commission on the sale of certain property owned and sold by the defendants. Upon the trial of this case the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. On this appeal this Court is requested to reverse the judgment entered thereon and to grant the defendants a new trial.

An examination of the record reveals the following facts. On…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Walker v. Monongahela Power CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Overton v. FieldsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Earl T. Browder, Inc. v. County Court of Webster CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Graham v. CristWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Graham v. WristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Jordan v. BeroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Price v. HalsteadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Higginbotham v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Poe v. PittmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API