Legal Opinion

Faunce v. Schueller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1943No. 33,253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiff brings this action as administrator of the estate of N. M. Faunce, deceased, on a promissory note for $825 in favor of decedent executed and delivered to him by defendant. Defendant admitted liability on the note but claimed a setoff in the sum of $2,906, basing his claim on Faunce’s alleged failure to prevent or redeem from the foreclosure of a first mortgage on premises formerly owned by defendant.

At the close of the testimony the trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount of the note, plus interest and costs, and denied defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Amick v. Empire Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Cooper v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Spooner v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. City Bank of York v. RiekerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Wells & Dewing v. Wells & ScribnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API