Legal Opinion

Meta v. Kramer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1933No. Appeal 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit upon a bail bond given on an appeal from a judgment of an alderman.

Plaintiff’s statement of claim sets forth in the second paragraph in substance as follows: On the 14th day of April, 1931, defendant herein became bail absolute for one, T. D. Johnson in an appeal from a judgment of an alderman in the case of “Joseph S. Meta v. T. D. Johnson, doing business as the National Survey Service” and signed for the benefit of the plaintiff therein the following bond, inter alia: “held in $600 as bail absolute for the payment of debt, interest and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Cambria Auto Co. v. FrischkornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Weaver v. ShimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egner v. McGinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Adams v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API