Cambria Auto Co. v. Frischkorn
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 183, April T., 1913, by defendant, from order of C. P. Cambria Co., Dec. T., 1912, No. 86, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Cambria Auto Company v. F. W. Frischkorn. Assumpsit on a bond. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 183, April T., 1913, by defendant, from order of C. P. Cambria Co., Dec. T., 1912, No. 86, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Cambria Auto Company v. F. W. Frischkorn. Assumpsit on a bond. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
This action was begun by a scire facias sur recognizance of bail. On December 28, 1910, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against C. B. Parker before M. R. Brennan, alderman of the city of Johnstown, Cambria county, for the sum of $283.85 and costs of suit. Following the judgment the alderman’s record shows the following: “And now, January 3, 1911, defendant appears and pays the costs.and takes an appeal, and enters bond.in the sum- of $300, with F. W. Frischkorn as surety.
*270“We are held in the sum of Three Hundred Dollars, as bail absolute, conditioned for the payment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haines v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Commonwealth v. Wistar, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meta v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Adams v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1934