Legal Opinion

Capital City Bank v. Board of Com'rs

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1921No. 2694PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Santa Fé County; Holloman, Judge. Action by the Capital City Bank against the Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fé County. Judgment for plaintiff ,and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

DAVIS, J.

The complaint in this case is based upon three certificates of indebtedness issued by Santa Fé county, April 4, 1918, each for $500, payable April 4, 1919, with 6 per cent interest. They were issued under the act entitled “An Act to Provide for the Public Defense,” approved May 8, 1917 (Laws 1917 [Ex. Sess.] c. 5), which authorized counties to levy a special tax of one mill for the years 1917 and 1918 to raise funds for highways and permitted them to anticipate the collection of the tax by the issue and sale of certificates of indebtedness. The levy of one mill…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Optic Pub. Co. v. Board of Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Civil Service League v. City of Santa Fe, NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Chesher v. BeallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Baca v. Board of Com'rs of Socorro CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. City of Hobbs v. State Ex Rel. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Las Vegas Independent Pub. Co. v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API