Legal Opinion

Lamz v. Geico General Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 1999No. 98-3619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

Appellants Randy and Deborah Lamz were involved in an automobile accident with a car driven by appellee Marnee Nichols and owned by appellee Morris Leisner. The Lamzes sued Nichols and Leisner, alleging that Nichols was negligent in the operation of Leisner’s automobile. As the Lamzes’ underinsured motorist carrier, Geico General Insurance *320Company (“Geico”) was joined as a party defendant.

Geico participated at trial as a party defendant, represented by its own attorney. A different attorney represented Nichols and Leisner. During voir dire, the trial judge identified all the defendants in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carls Markets v. MeyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Dosdourian v. CarstenSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. KrawzakSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. Medina v. PeraltaSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Nicaise v. GagnonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamz v. Geico General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Armstrong v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API