Medina v. Peralta
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
724 So.2d 1188 (1999)
Anderson A. MEDINA, Sr. and Jorge Perez, Petitioners,
v.
David PERALTA, Respondent.
No. 92,577.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 21, 1999.
Christopher J. Lynch of Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.
Pamela Beckham of Beckham & Beckham, P.A., North Miami Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
WELLS, J.
We have for review Medina v. Peralta, 705 So.2d 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), which certified conflict with Furtado v. Walmer, 673 So.2d 568 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We approve Medina for the reasons…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stecher v. PomeroySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. KrawzakSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Mansfield v. RiveroSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Stecher v. PomeroyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Krawzak v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Special v. BauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Earle v. CobbKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Lamz v. Geico General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. BlackmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- King v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.