Legal Opinion

Eablonski v. Close

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1924No. 5,425PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from tbe defendant for the loss of certain crops of bay which it is al*294leged were totally destroyed by defendant’s sheep trespassing thereon. The crops involved consisted of 130 acres of rye hay, which the testimony disclosed would have cut about sixty-five tons, and twenty acres of blue-joint hay which would have produced fifteen tons but for their destruction. The case was tried before a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $500 and costs. Defendant made a motion for a new trial,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poindexter & Orr Live Stock Co. v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Allen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Continental Oil & Cotton Co. v. WristenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Lundvick v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. McCarthy v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Baker v. Citizens' State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Agrilease, Inc. v. GrayMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. First National Bank v. PerrineMontana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API