T v. Ryan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and United Transportation Union
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Five members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers who are employed by the Union Pacific Railroad as trainmen brought suit against the Union Pacific and the trainmen’s union, United Transportation Union. They sought a declaration that they are entitled to be represented in grievance proceedings by their union, the BLE, rather than by the UTU, even though the collective bargaining agreement between the Union Pacific and the UTU appoints the latter as the trainmen’s exclusive representative in grievance proceedings. The district court dismissed the suit for want of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. RychlikSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Daniel L. Kulavic, Cross-Appellee v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- John P. McElroy v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, a Corporation, and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Landers v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Santiago v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- McClendon v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen, General Committee of Adjustment, Central Region v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.