Legal Opinion

United States v. Forney

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 26, 2009No. 05-0647/NAPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the judgment of the Court.

Appellant was convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman by possessing child pornography. Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2000). We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred by using a federal statute that the Supreme Court subsequently held to be unconstitu*273tional to define “child pornography.” The military judge did not err in using the statute to define child pornography under these circumstances and the possession of images of virtual children engaged in sexually…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  2. United States v. MoonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  3. United States v. BeatyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  4. United States v. BarberiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  5. United States v. Major KENDALL M. AMAZAKI, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API