Legal Opinion

Harris v. Tom Griffith Water Well & Conductor Service, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2010No. 2007-CT-00639-SCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

KITCHENS, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. William Harris sued his former employer, Tom Griffith Water Well & Conductor Service, Inc. (Griffith Water Well, alternatively, Griffith), 1 in the Marion County Chancery Court, alleging that Griffith had failed to compensate him fully 'for his services pursuant to a verbal agreement. Following trial, the chancellor entered a judgment in favor of Griffith, finding that the terms of their initial agreement had been modified and that Harris was not owed any money. The Court of Appeals reversed, and this Court granted Griffith’s petition…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cummings v. BendermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Biglane v. Under the Hill Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kight v. Sheppard Bldg. Supply, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Warwick v. MatheneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Garner v. HickmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warren E. Johnson Companies v. Unified Brand, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  2. American Public Finance, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
  3. O & G Leasing, LLC v. First Security Bank (In Re O & G Leasing, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
  4. Fairchilds v. Delta Found. Inc. (In Re Estate of Jones)Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  5. Joe Michael Coleman v. Thomas McKinney Coleman and Larry Redell Coleman, By and Through His Conservator, Greg YoungerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API