Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the court on a stipulation of facts and cross-motions for partial summary judgment filed by the parties. As outlined below, certain claims apply to all Plaintiffs and two claims apply only to the cities of Seattle and Tacoma.
II. FACTS
Plaintiffs (referred to collectively as taxpayers and individually as taxpayer or, where appropriate, as Snohomish, Seattle, or Tacoma) are engaged in one or more aspects of the generation, transmission, and distribution of electric energy. Snohomish is a public utility district and municipal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Cook County v. United States Ex Rel. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clackamas Cty. Assess. v. Village at Main St., Tc 4877 (or.tax 9-1-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009
- D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 2023
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006